@fedilab Are they also reporting Google Chrome for allowing access to the web version of the same site ? 🤔
Either you block gap like Tusky and people go nuts or you don't block it and people go nuts.
You just can't win 😔
@fedilab using the very tacticts that they fear from gab users... don't let those guys get at you, they are becoming what they claim to fight...
more gab fediverse bs
@fedilab but of course the gab users are the problem. How can people be this dense? They are being actively malicious whereas gab staff are actively trying to make the merge of gab with the fediverse as smooth as possible for both parties.
In mastodon, there is already a way for me to hide everything from a server.
I think that is very powerful and should be enough for an individual user to make that decision.
A server owner/admin is also free to make the decision to whether to block certain servers. After all, they are the one paying for bandwidth and storage.
Say, if servers Ⓐ and Ⓑ are connected. Ⓐ blocks ĝ, but Ⓑ is connected to ĝ. Would ĝ still appears on server Ⓐ, indirectly?
@fedilab #FDroid forum has a thread calling Tusky as nonfree and suggesting it should be patched or flagged as having antifeatures: https://forum.f-droid.org/t/tusky-is-nonfree/6448/8
I didn't know gab before that matter, and I will not say I know it more because I didn't create an account to test it.
What I noticed, a lot of people took their responsibilities (ban or don't ban them) and some others are fighting everyones that don't act against them.
I am not one of them, but this is not related to a specific instance. I will simply not block instances with the app.
@fedilab "staying neutral isn’t an option but instead will lead to the uprise of (...) oppression and harassment against marginalized groups"
Le réseau social de l'avenir : pas de publicité, pas de surveillance institutionnelle, conception éthique et décentralisation ! Gardez le contrôle de vos données avec Mastodon !