Framapiaf

0 message0 participant0 message aujourd’hui

CBO [Raceme] @ le17Aujourd'hui au boulot <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/3615mavie" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#3615mavie</a> : en attendant des mises à jour d'os propriétaires qui n'en finissaient pas je me suis rendu compte par hasard, et avec ravissement, qu' <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/openwrt" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#openwrt</a> avait été porté sur les bornes <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/wifi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#wifi</a> de <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/Ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ruckus</a> ZF7372. Il se trouve que j'en ai une vingtaine qui dorment sur l'étagère pour cause d'obsolescence (programmée ?) suite au changement de notre contrôleur WiFi. Aller hop: un petit <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/FTDI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#FTDI</a>, minicom et un serveur <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/tftp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#tftp</a> sur la <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/xubuntu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#xubuntu</a>. Le plus long a été de déclipser le boîtier sans le casser (5 bonnes minutes), 1 minute pour brancher les câbles Dupont et 3 minutes pour flasher. Et une bonne dose de satisfaction pour cette journée :)

Stefano MarinelliLast night I was amazed that even the most remote devices remained connected to the 'small' MikroTik CAP AC. This morning one of the devices disconnected and couldn't reconnect. I conducted a brief survey (using WifiMan on the Pixel 7 with GrapheneOS, disabling the polling frequency limit for wifi from developer options) and indeed, the difference compared to the Ruckus is quite marked. At the limits of the house, even though the Ruckus shows a weak signal, the devices can still communicate well without packet loss. The MikroTik signal is definitely weaker and more unstable. I expected this for two reasons: I'm comparing two devices from completely different ranges, from totally different generations, and with significantly different prices. In fact, for the price of one Ruckus, you could buy about 12 or 13 CAP AC units. So the question I now ask myself is: was it more sensible to keep two separate access points in two key areas of the house (as I did years ago) or a central Ruckus? I will answer this once I get a more recent generation MikroTik for a client. That will be a clearer test. Ruckus excels in particularly crowded environments, which is certainly not my home.<a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ruckus</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/MikroTik" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#MikroTik</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Wifi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Wifi</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/HomeLab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#HomeLab</a>

Stefano MarinelliFor a long time, I used three access points at home. A few months ago, I decided to downsize and see if, with technological advances, I could reduce the number of APs. Obviously, the more remote areas would be penalized, but at the moment I don't need a lot of bandwidth, just stability. So I kept only the Omada 670 - hung from the ceiling, roughly in the center of the house. The coverage was fairly complete, except for a few unimportant corners. It was ok-ish.I had the opportunity to get a Ruckus R550 at an interesting price (for a Ruckus, of course) and, despite having lower speed performance than the Omada, I wanted to try it. Initially I was disappointed. The coverage was almost the same (but the Ruckus is in a slightly worse position, about a meter from the Omada but resting on a wooden piece of furniture), so I didn't see the advantages. However, I left it running, since I had it. The network remained stable for months.A few days ago I needed the poe injector I use for the Ruckus (while the Omada is powered by its own power supply) so I reconnected the Omada and turned off the Ruckus. Same channels, same configuration.Suddenly, I realized the difference. Even seeing (almost) the same signal levels from the monitoring apps, the actual performance is very different. Even in a distant room with many walls (of brick and concrete) in between, the 5Ghz signal of the Ruckus remains stable and reliable, while with the Omada it was much less stable. As "bars", almost the same. But with the Omada it is a continuous packet loss and switching to 2.4 GHz. Moreover, the most distant device (a Raspberry PI A+ with FreeBSD) with the Omada loses signal several times a day, with the Ruckus no problem and despite having a minimum bandwidth, it does not lose packets.Going back to the Omada for a few days showed me that yes, there are differences. Yesterday I reconnected the Ruckus. Gone, again, all the problems. Of course, with the cost of a Ruckus (on offer) I get 3 "superior" Omadas, but the difference is there.<a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/WiFI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#WiFI</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Omada" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Omada</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ruckus</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Networking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Networking</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Wireless" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Wireless</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/AccessPoint" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#AccessPoint</a>

Toy Box ComixRandom Old Comic: Subscription Service Part 1 <a href="https://www.toyboxcomix.com/2017/04/30/subscriptionservicepart1/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.toyboxcomix.com/2017/04/30/subscriptionservicepart1/</a> Subscription Service Part 1 <a href="https://retro.pizza/tags/Needlenose" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Needlenose</a> <a href="https://retro.pizza/tags/Ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ruckus</a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/815217756713386/posts/1235083004726857?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/815217756713386/posts/1235083004726857?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon</a>

Comics and Jokes @ Lucentinian Works Co LtdNew entry of AI-generated <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=comics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#comics</a> and <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=jokes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#jokes</a> added to our <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=website" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#website</a>:<a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=Regulation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Regulation</a> <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=Ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ruckus</a><a href="https://comics.lucentinian.com/1749" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">comics.lucentinian.com/1749</a> <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=NewsJokes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#NewsJokes</a> <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=VisitNow" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#VisitNow</a> <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=VisitUsNow" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#VisitUsNow</a> <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=AILaughs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#AILaughs</a> <a href="https://social.lucentinian.com/search?tag=AIHumor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#AIHumor</a>

Absolutegamer MagazineRuckus, sviluppato da ex Bethesda e Gearbox, fonde l'estetica di Fallout con le meccaniche di sopravvivenza di The Forest. Ambientato in una città americana anni '50 invasa dagli alieni, permette di costruire basi, creare armi e salvare cittadini. <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ruckus</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/videogiochi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#videogiochi</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/gaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#gaming</a>👉 <a href="https://www.absolutegamer.it/il-nuovo-gioco-di-ruolo-di-sopravvivenza-da-un-ex-sviluppatore-di-elder-scrolls-sembra-un-fallout-cooperativo-ecco-a-voi-ruckus/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.absolutegamer.it/il-nuovo-gioco-di-ruolo-di-sopravvivenza-da-un-ex-sviluppatore-di-elder-scrolls-sembra-un-fallout-cooperativo-ecco-a-voi-ruckus/</a>

: j@fabrica:~/src; :t_blink:Oh, so that’s why I’ve getting patch updates but not latest major versions. Apparently, all my <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/ubiquiti" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ubiquiti</a> unifi wifi hardware is “Legacy” now: <a href="https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500001268521-Ubiquiti-s-Vintage-and-Legacy-Products" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500001268521-Ubiquiti-s-Vintage-and-Legacy-Products</a>So what’s the preferred access points to pair with a <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/pfsense" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#pfsense</a> edge router these days? <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/aruba" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#aruba</a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/tpLink" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#tpLink</a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/ruckus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ruckus</a> or stick with <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/unifi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#unifi</a>?

Recherches récentes

Options de recherche

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

#Ruckus