I need someone to change my mind.
I have seen a few posts suggesting that people change from WhatsApp to Signal.
Both messaging platforms are end-to-end encrypted (E2EE).
Both use the same E2EE protocol -- Signal's.
One is run by Meta, the other by the non-profit Signal Foundation.
[1/N]
UPDATE: my mind was changed! See https://cosocial.ca/@evan/113868502932953700
So, here's my concern: if you don't want to use WhatsApp because it's owned and operated by Meta, that means you don't have a lot of confidence in that end-to-end encryption.
And if you don't have confidence in it when it's run by Meta, why should you have confidence in it when it's run by Signal Foundation?
I assume this is because even when conversations are end-to-end encrypted, there is data exhaust around the edges -- like the timing of conversations, or profile data.
Is that roughly it? Or am I missing something important about this?
So, as far as I can tell from the thread, here are the reasons, in roughly descending order for importance from me:
1) Signal is Open Source
2) Signal does a better job encrypting metadata and other incremental improvements in security
3) People trust Signal much more than Meta
4) People want to show alignment with Signal more than Meta
I think these are pretty convincing. Thanks all who replied!
@evan and #signal 's boss is on #mastodon ! @Mer__edith
If you haven't heard of her, she gave an outstanding interview in #Wired last year that is a stark departure from anything a Zuck would ever say.